PDA

View Full Version : The 22nd Annual Razzie award nominations

john316
12-02-2002, 12:09
The ceremony for the year's worst movies is just around the corner, here are some of the 'top' nominations

Worst Movie:

Freddy got Fingered
Pearl Harbor
Driven
Glitter
3000 Miles to Graceland

Worst Actor:

Tom Green (FGF)
Ben Affleck (PH)
Kevin Costner (3000 MTG)
Keanu Reeves (Dual nomination for Sweet November and Hardball)
John Travolta (Swordfish and Domestic Disturbance)

Worst Actress:

Penelope Cruz (Captain Corelli)
Mariah Carey (Glitter)
Jennifer Lopez (Angel Eyes and Wedding Planner)
Angelina Jolie (Orignial Sin and Tomb Raider)
Charlize Theron (Sweet November)

Worst on-screen couple:

Mariah Carey's breasts (Glitter)
Sly Stallone and Burt Reynolds (Driven)
Kurt Russell and Courtney Cox/Kevin Costner (3000 MTG)
Tom Green and the animals he abuses (FGF)
Ben Affleck and Kate Beckinsale/Josh Hartnett (PH)

Worst Director

Michael Bay (PH)
Peter Chelson and Warren Beatty (Town and Country)
Tom Green (FGF)
Vondie Curtis Hall (Glitter)
Renny Harlin (Driven)

They have completely missed the whole point of Freddy got Fingered - it is deliberately bad!!! :D
Ono
12-02-2002, 12:28
Originally posted by john316



Worst on-screen couple:

Mariah Carey's breasts (Glitter)





For acting ability they were poor. Worse perfomance by a pair of tits since Beatty and Hoffman in Ishtar.

:clap: :clap: :clap:
mr_woo
12-02-2002, 12:39
i really dont think 3000 Miles To Graceland deserves to be on the list, i really enjoyed it and thought it was a great action flick!
Preacher
12-02-2002, 12:57
Originally posted by mr_woo
i really dont think 3000 Miles To Graceland deserves to be on the list, i really enjoyed it and thought it was a great action flick!

Ditto. I thought it was Costners Best film for years! :confused:
Goblin
12-02-2002, 12:57
Originally posted by john316

Worst Movie:
Pearl Harbor
Driven

Worst Actor:
Ben Affleck (PH)
John Travolta (Swordfish and Domestic Disturbance)

Worst Actress:
Angelina Jolie (Orignial Sin and Tomb Raider)

Worst on-screen couple:
Sly Stallone and Burt Reynolds (Driven)


- I could think of much worse then Driven and Pearl Harbour!

- Travolta was great in Swordfish, nothing wrong with Affleck either!

- Jolie was the only thing that made me keep watching Tomb Raider!

- Stallone and Reynolds were onscreen together for about 3mins
toot
12-02-2002, 13:47
damn, i thought that said razzle
Joe Pasquale
12-02-2002, 13:56
Originally posted by john316

Worst Movie:

Freddy got Fingered


Worst Actor:

Tom Green (FGF)


Worst on-screen couple:

Tom Green and the animals he abuses (FGF)


Worst Director

Tom Green (FGF)



I see they've found a replacement for Pauly Shore already. ;) :D

Criminal that 'Rock Star' and '15 Minutes' aren't nominated though. :confused:
Nathan-Wind
12-02-2002, 14:00
I agree with you guys re: 3000mtg. Costner was really good in it.
john316
12-02-2002, 14:07
Originally posted by Nathan-Wind
I agree with you guys re: 3000mtg. Costner was really good in it.

He was dire in it - looked as though he was replaced by a robot impersonating Costner :D
Goblin
12-02-2002, 14:14
Originally posted by Joe Pasquale


I see they've found a replacement for Pauly Shore already. ;) :D


LOL I wondered were he went and then I seen him in the new Casper film the other day!
neverland
13-02-2002, 07:59
Am I the only person who thinks the Razzies are a complete waste of time? They're just way too predictable. Even the Oscars have a few surprises now and again. The Razzies nominations just reads like a list of whatever big studio films have taken a bit of a critical beating. And whatever film Stallone released that year obviously.

I just think something like the Razzies should be challenging the establishment, not be part of it.
powlest
13-02-2002, 10:45
I liked 3000 miles to graceland also:) There were certainly LOTS of worce films than that last year.
ozric99
16-02-2002, 17:48
Worst Movie: Moulin Rouge

Surely that should have received a nomination. One of the most overrated piles of tripe I've ever had the misfortune to see.
john316
16-02-2002, 17:54
I also want to know why David Duchovny in Evolution is not nominated - he has bad in that!
The Dude
16-02-2002, 18:09
I'm absolutely amazed that Planet Of The Apes and Tomb Raider aren't up for worst films. I still get nightmares over these 2 turds.
Ron Hill
16-02-2002, 21:44
John 316: Totally agree with you there on Evolution. Duchnovy was
truly awful.

Disagree with your opinion on 3000MTG though. I truly enjoyed this
movie. Best shoot-em-up i've seen in ages and a crackin' soundtrack to
boot.
the_edge30
17-02-2002, 01:17
15 minutes is class!

Agree that Planet of the Apes should have been nominated, along with David Duchovny and in fact evolution was awful!

Also, i thought FGF was quite good, just for the bit where hes skateboarding through the mall, class!

Inabit

CHRIS!
john316
17-02-2002, 01:49
Originally posted by Ron Hill
Disagree with your opinion on 3000MTG though. I truly enjoyed this movie. Best shoot-em-up i've seen in ages and a crackin' soundtrack to boot.

It is weird this film - there are those who really like it and those which think it is one of the worst action movies they have ever seen - I am in the who thinks it was absolutely dire with no plot, hardly any decent performances and decidely uncool action scenes. In fact all I can say for it is that:

1. Christian Slater is killed early on
2. Courteney Cox (as discussed a while back in another thread) looks f'n amazing in it
3. Kurt Russell is quite good in it

That is it - don't get me wrong, I absolutely love action movies and when I saw someone describing it at IMDB as 'Face/Off meets Pulp Fiction' I thought how can it go wrong - turns it that post must have been from one of the film's producer's as it is not fit to wipe Face/Off's arse and, bar guns and a few slomos, has nothing in common with that classic and even less in common with Pulp Fiction. Also, if you look at IMDB, you expect to see some total bloodbath - I didn't see anything that made me bat an eyelid.
mr_woo
17-02-2002, 02:47
Originally posted by john316


That is it - don't get me wrong, I absolutely love action movies and when I saw someone describing it at IMDB as 'Face/Off meets Pulp Fiction' I thought how can it go wrong - turns it that post must have been from one of the film's producer's as it is not fit to wipe Face/Off's arse and, bar guns and a few slomos, has nothing in common with that classic and even less in common with Pulp Fiction. Also, if you look at IMDB, you expect to see some total bloodbath - I didn't see anything that made me bat an eyelid.

I can totally understand your disappointment with the film when some plonker describes it as 'Face/Off meets Pulp Fiction' as it's obviously not that.

The first time i watched it i was disappointed with it, especially with the action scenes as they weren't long enough and i hated the 'MTV editing' to it.

Then i watched it again pretty recently and i really really enjoyed and realised it wasnt that bad, i had just built my hopes up to high initially and it was great seeing ol Kurt Russell in action again :)
Fever Dawg
17-02-2002, 14:49
I think 15 Minutes was probably the worst film I saw last year .... closely followed by Reindeer Games (Deception) and 3000 MTG !!!