PDA

View Full Version : Robocop Bluray review


thescrounger
08-08-2006, 21:41
http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/robocop.html#HDBonus



Alas, this first-ever Blu-ray release continues 'RoboCop's losing streak, with a genuinely poor visual presentation whose flaws are only exacerbated by the high resolution of HD.

The most recent DVD release of 'RoboCop' came from MGM, and this Blu-ray transfer looks as if it was sourced from the same master. Though I am more than content that a film from 1987 would look grainy, there is a fair amount of dirt and blemishes on the print as well. (Faring the worst are any effects shots involving mattes or stop-motion animation -- they look pretty dreadful.) Colors suffer from a dated and inconsistent appearance -- oversaturated and plugged up one moment, faded the next. Fleshtones are also often wildly inaccurate, with some scenes appearing so out-of-whack that the faces of actors looked like they were drawn with red crayon. Detail is also poor, with the image flat and two-dimensional throughout. Shadow delineation is even worse, with darker areas falling off into black and little fine detail visible. Some edge enhancement appears to have been liberally applied as well, with slight halos visible around sharply-contrasted objects.

Don't think I'd bother upgrading this film to HD until some company has had a proper go at trying to improve the transfer.

Swafe
08-08-2006, 22:56
I didnt even buy this movie on Beta-Max, let alone VHS :lol:

captaineyecatch
08-08-2006, 22:58
Total waste of time as its the R rated version only. Great way of Sony to appeal to movie fans by not releasing the directors cuts of various movies :cuckoo:

roadkill_88
08-08-2006, 23:13
Bah, what the hell are they playing at? Poor quality and no DC? At least the quality of BD Terminator is said to be excellent.

xraystan
09-08-2006, 07:37
The Criterion edition of Robocop is the only one worth having. It's the fully uncut version too.

allan
09-08-2006, 08:32
The MGM DVD is ok, the only bad part of it is the so called seamless branching. The picture is much better than the Criterion and the remix on the sound is better. I know it's cropped, but it almost certainly would've been shown theatrically at 1.85:1 rather than the 1.66:1 on the Criterion. This was only because Paul Verhoeven, being European, was used to filming films in the AR as it was more common for European films apparently.

thescrounger
09-08-2006, 08:55
The MGM R1 doesn't have seamless branching, it's just the directors cut by default.

Harsin
09-08-2006, 14:55
The Criterion edition of Robocop is the only one worth having. It's the fully uncut version too.

Damn straight!

I hate the MGM edition, feels like you're watching CSI:New York with special guest star Robocop.

Jorin
09-08-2006, 18:01
The MGM version was "colour-corrected", too. Wrongly so. Robocop is blue, FFS!

The Criterion version's presentation was overseen by Verhoeven himself, so a truer reflection.

I love my Criterion copy. I love it like I love HAMMmamMM!!!1111 :lol:

GarethH
12-08-2006, 09:27
The Blu-ray version has now been pulled from release. They say its because Fox now owns the rights to distribution, but I'm guessing its because of the poor quality.

roadkill_88
12-08-2006, 21:06
^^^ Link for that...

http://dvd.themanroom.com/dvd-newsview.php?id=244

DeadKenny
12-08-2006, 21:57
Criterion version all the way. No mucking about with the colour to satisfy people who like glossy saturated and detail lacking remasters, no stupid branching, and the transfer and ratio is that approved by Verhoeven.

I just wish Criterion could get the rights again and do an HD version. They really need to get into HD and show how film restoration and transfers should be done rather than just chucking films at a glorified version of Photoshop that just irons out all the detail in an attempt to make films glossy so fans of big modern blockbusters will love them :oh-hum:.

And don't even get me started on the practice of remixing old audio tracks into DD5.1 and DTS, especially mono! :brickwall.