Are you a SERIOUS collector ???

[Robby]

There seems to be an awful lot of trading shenanigans going on in the dvd classifieds. I wondered how many people keep all their films they like?.

I'm very reluctant to get rid of any movies i own therefore i usually only buy from the classifieds. And judging by the 'how many do you have' thread a lot of you keep your movies.

What sort of titles do you consider a 'Must Keep' ??, although i own a few films that are not, shall we say, classics ie, Godzilla, Lost in Space and Hollow Man, i would still never get rid of them as i consider myself a collector.

I get the impression a lot of people buy the films they want to watch and then try and flog them at the earliest opportunity. Or they order too many copies ;) and try and make a little cash back;) ;) .

I'm very much a collector any ways, what about yourselves?????

[Michael Brooke]

I keep virtually everything - but I generally buy stuff that I know I'll be wanting to keep in the first place. I've sold/given away some discs, but almost always because I'd bought an improved version.

[Steviey]

I would certainly call myself a collector...I have a few in my collection which I know I will never watch again but keep them all the same...Mad I know...So many DVD's these days are advertised as "collectors Edition" or "Special Edition". I know there are a handful out there which collect Criterion discs - as these films tend not to be mainstream I would assume these people are the die-hard collectors...Then again, maybe not.

Since collecting I have only ever sold one film here (American werewolf in London) only because a "special edition" was announced.

[Deaks]

I have a mixed sellection of older and newer titles, titles everyone seems to regard as good and some most laugh at such as my world class Chuck Norris collection!

My definition of a "keeper" is anything I'm going to want to watch more than twice. It's then worth the investment of having it sitting on the shelf for when I'm in the right mood for that type of film.

I buy most of the big releases as I don't get to the cinema as much as I'd like, and once I've watched them I'll keep them for a while to lend out and either sell on or add to my keepers.

Deaks.

[Bamse]

I keep most of my DVD’s (I have 247 at the moment) but if I have a film that I know I am not going to watch again, I trade it in. I do this in an exchange shop in Kinston. Saying this, it does surprise my when I go into the shop on a Tuesday and find films released just the day before,;) some of them still in the shrink wrap. The proprietors assure me that they are not stolen, as they always ask the person trading in the DVD, (if it is new) for the receipt. I suppose some people buy 2 identical DVD’s from sales, such as BOGOF or BOGOHP and trade in one of them. Either way it keeps me in cheap and sometimes brand new DVD’s.:) :) :)

[Ron Hill]

Deaks: Your buying habits sound very like mine. :)

I'm not REALLY embarrassed about anything in my collection but my wife has bought a few two for one duffers in bargain bins in Tesco.

The only films I bought that I really,really think are a waste of space are the following absolute stinkers.

1) Bedazzled. - Not even the appearance of a black lamborghini can save this awful mess.
2) Kevin & Perry Go Large. - Painfully unfunny. The disc is saved from binning because it has the excellent Kevin's guide to being a teenager.
3) What Lies Beneath. - So "by the numbers" it's like a kids ABC book. How can such talent produce such predictable tripe I ask?
4) Dreamscape. - Loved it years ago. Bought it, found out they'd edited out the naked Kate Capshaw bit. Bah humbug!

[urruri]

yes

[RichB]

With anything other than my HK movies I feel I am

I will however buy any HK film, with very little idea of what it is like because a) I have no chance to rent it/see it unless I buy it
b) most of them are so damn cheap it's like "Ahhh why not!" ;)

[john316]

My rule is that I keep any movie that I may have an interest in ever seeing again. If not, then it is shown the door to the DVD classifieds!

[Madm@tt]

I NEVER trade in a DVD because I am brilliant at choosing the top quality stuff...

Only once have I traded a DVD, and that was Chicken Run... Which I saw at the cinema - very drunk or something - and it surpassed all expectations. got it for Christmas on DVD and I loathed it...

Otherwise I have picked up nothing REALLY bad - the occasional trip back to Tesco (my form of renting - for free!) with stuff like The House on Haunted Hill!

[Alan. b]

I have not and will not trade in any of my collection. I am happy with every purchase. If I don't like a film then I don't buy it in the first place, even if it a top title.

[AndyWilson]

I know if I get rid of anything I'll end up with a craving to see it again - even The Acid House

[Innuendo]

I've kept all my DVD's (110) apart from doubles (from buying better versions). Other than that I've never bought a film that I thought was so bad I had to get rid of it...even Wild Wild West which I can not stand to watch! But I keep my DVD's because I never know when I might need them. I always regret selling old consoles and the classic games and wished I'd of kept them but I thought I'd never want to see them again. So practicly every DVD I buy I'll keep...

[dtsrules]

I buy most of the latest releases as its cheaper than taking the wife and 3 kids to the cinema, plus i know i can trade/sell it on unless of course its a classic in the style of Tomb Raider :p

[Lenny Nero]

Well I've only sold about 14 DVDs and only because I've bought new SE versions of each of them, so I do keep every movie as I like everything I buy. Rarely do I get something without seeing and if I do, I get it mostly because of the actors and that's like knowing I'll like it.
Also, I've just spent over $400 on LD player and discs to watch about thirty movies I like in a little better format than VHS, so that borders on obsessive...got lucky enough go get 99% of them Factory Sealed! :D

I gotta get to doing my DVDProfiler collection though, as DVDAfficionado doesn't have other than R1 titles and so I've stopped updating it but the thought of catalouging what could be nearly 600 titles scares me :eek: I only wish DVDProfiler had a feature like Afficionado where you just enter the titles in a row instead of adding each one individually, takes so much more time.

[Robby]

It's good to see you all cherish your collection as much as i do. I must admit i would be pretty gutted if they were stolen or perished in a fire. I guess the more movies you aquire the more paternal you get over them. I was very proud of my VHS collection a while back but now they have lost their appeal, i don't think i'll get rid of them (unless i replace them with DVD:D ).

This movie collecting lark can be a fickle business, i wonder how long it'll be before i start to look at my DVD collection as 'old hat'??

[Lenny Nero]

Originally posted by robby
It's good to see you all cherish your collection as much as i do. I must admit i would be pretty gutted if they were stolen or perished in a fire. I guess the more movies you aquire the more paternal you get over them. I was very proud of my VHS collection a while back but now they have lost their appeal, i don't think i'll get rid of them (unless i replace them with DVD:D ).

This movie collecting lark can be a fickle business, i wonder how long it'll be before i start to look at my DVD collection as 'old hat'??

That's the thing Robby, I wasn't buying VHS much even though they were around for a couple of decades, but DVDs and Laserdiscs, DVDs especially, first of all do not degrade with time, they'll only start degrading in about 110 years after their production date, by which time you'll be all dead and smelly and disgusting pile of degrading flesh :( . Thats one, two, the quality is so good that nothing can be better, not in 2D, not with our human eyes. Unless "they" come up with some sort of 3D enveloping personal reproduction system, or something that you plug into your brain ala Circuitry Man, these DVDs are for life! That's psychology drives many and thats why they are so successful. :D
Most likely thing, and the worst thing that can happen, is that more data will fit onto DVD sized media, or some tiny Minidisc sized DVDs will come out that fit the whole library of MGM films ever released, Volume 1: 1980-1983... or something like that, but again, your DVD collection will never be an old hat, it's always useful and always beautiful :cool:

[Robby]

Originally posted by Lenny Nero
your DVD collection will never be an old hat, it's always useful and always beautiful :cool:

AMEN :D

[rajamaki]

i make sure i order all my discs while balancing a fish on my head & spray painting gerald (my pet geranium) purple.
Does that make me a serious collector?

[Grumpy]

I have always collected films and am still in the process of replacing some of my classic videos.
I like to trade and watch films I perhaps would not be interested in keeping or ones I missed at the cinema. That way I am sometimes pleasantly surpised and end up keeping them anyway.

[Cornelius]

On the whole I buy films I know and will watch again so rarely get rid of any. The films I do get rid of tend to be discs which I have replaced with better versions. Occasionally there are films I don't know that I've bought as a result of a recommendation from someone on the forums that I haven't liked which I will pass on. This hasn't happened for some time though because I now know whose opinions are likely to lead to a film I like.

[Ben Martin]

wow, this turned out to be a more interesting thread than i thought! i have to admit that it had never crossed my mind that people might buy movies that they don't actually "love" and "want to own for keeps". whatever the sometimes obscure reasons for doing so, that's why i buy (and keep) my dvds. guess i'd assumed everyone did likewise.

occasionally i decide i've had an abberation and a disc gets sold off, but it's a rarity and the only other time i change discs is when a better version comes out. so i like the fact that dvdprofiler shows movies i like enough to keep - it says something about me ... for better or worse! :o each to their own, but isn't what some people are doing almost the same as renting? but more expensive? well, i guess if you're loaded it can't hurt! :)

[Ben Martin]

Originally posted by Lenny Nero
two, the quality is so good that nothing can be better, not in 2D, not with our human eyes.

i think i see what you're getting at - the best possible picture in the home at the moment, right? indeed, nothing can better dvd for home pre-recorded viewing right now, but that has absolutely nothing to do with our eyes. something else could, and will given time, be better than dvd and yet still be easily perceived down to the last detail by our "human eyes", e.g. blue-laser DVD. already HDTV (if you can get it!) provides a higher vertical resolution than dvd and human eyes can distinguish every line. it's the issue of availability that defines dvd as "nothing can be better, not in 2D" for the home right now. i watch my dvds on my computer monitor, which can display over 1500 quite perceivable vertical lines of resolution .... i'm just lacking a home video format that uses them all! :)

but i reckon those blue-laser HD-DVDs (or HDVDs) will be with us within 5 years (though not mass market for another 5 years after that). i've virtually been shouted down for even mentioning that before now by those who fear their dvds will become 'redundant'. however, i don't think this will be the case - HDVD players are bound to be backwards compatible. that said, we're "serious collectors" remember? (bringing this back to the thread!) so no doubt we will all be as hopelessly addicted as we are now! .... buying everything all over again to get our 1080 lines of resolution, no more edge-enhancement (woo-hoo!), full-bitrate dolby and dts tracks (in whatever format they'll have reached) and extras in a quantity that'll make current SEs look 'bare-boned'! :)

[Narshty]

I'm constantly honing and planing my collection - pondering for weeks whether to get a certain title or not, and flogging off anything that falls out of my affections, however slightly, on the Classifieds.

Click on my 'WWW' button down there, and see for yourself.

[saviola]

I consider myself a serious collector, not just of DVD's.

Over the past few months I have been slow at buying new stuff though. I keep all the films I like and tend to trade up when a beeter edition comes out.

Last count: 250 DVD's, and amazingly 2500+ VHS AAAGGGHH, i must change them to DVD, hope the CC company don't mind.

<b>EDIT</b> I have a spare bedroom where I store all of these in floor to cieling bookshelfs.

[Lenny Nero]

Originally posted by Ben Martin
Originally posted by Lenny Nero
two, the quality is so good that nothing can be better, not in 2D, not with our human eyes.

i think i see what you're getting at - the best possible picture in the home at the moment, right? indeed, nothing can better dvd for home pre-recorded viewing right now, but that has absolutely nothing to do with our eyes. something else could, and will given time, be better than dvd and yet still be easily perceived down to the last detail by our "human eyes", e.g. blue-laser DVD. already HDTV (if you can get it!) provides a higher vertical resolution than dvd and human eyes can distinguish every line. it's the issue of availability that defines dvd as "nothing can be better, not in 2D" for the home right now. i watch my dvds on my computer monitor, which can display over 1500 quite perceivable vertical lines of resolution .... i'm just lacking a home video format that uses them all! :)

but i reckon those blue-laser HD-DVDs (or HDVDs) will be with us within 5 years (though not mass market for another 5 years after that). i've virtually been shouted down for even mentioning that before now by those who fear their dvds will become 'redundant'. however, i don't think this will be the case - HDVD players are bound to be backwards compatible. that said, we're "serious collectors" remember? (bringing this back to the thread!) so no doubt we will all be as hopelessly addicted as we are now! .... buying everything all over again to get our 1080 lines of resolution, no more edge-enhancement (woo-hoo!), full-bitrate dolby and dts tracks (in whatever format they'll have reached) and extras in a quantity that'll make current SEs look 'bare-boned'! :)

Well yes, the resolution might be a little higher, but if you get a projector like in a theater, that wouldn't bother you, even right now. More disc space of course will mean lower compression of audio and video, but again, the differences are only going to be major on paper and technically, not in our perception or experience of them. Audio isn't going to go much further either, unless you hang yourself in the air and place a speaker above and below yourself for 8.1EX*(#*@#&(*&#@$SUPADOOPA-DTS :D Still not much difference, human ears can't even identify the difference between 192kbps and 320kbps, as the difference cannot be percieved with our ancient ears, we're not even dogs. Our sight is also limited to a particular range, so we wont be seeing any new dimensions or colors or anything like that. The progression will only be subtle like with Superbit DVDs where without actually comparing two particular images side to side and looking really really hard, you won't see that one is a little clearer.
It's also a question of what's satisfying enough for each individual. If the same movies are released on mini discs size of a nail that you stick into your ear and push the virtual screen onto your eyes extracting from behind your other ear with a higher bitrate of both video and audio, it's still just a different way of seeing the same damn thing! The experience and what we see and hear wont change, maybe just in our mind or imagination.
So again, unless its some 3d enveloping system that places you right into the movie where you can turn left and right and walk around the characters, I don't see any major breakthroughs in this field, experience related.
Technically of course there will be many new cool gadgets etc.

[Robby]

Originally posted by Ben Martin
but isn't what some people are doing almost the same as renting? but more expensive? well, i guess if you're loaded it can't hurt! :)

This is the main reason i started this thread. From hanging around the DVD classifieds for a while i got the impression that a lot of people bought a stack of movies they wanted to see and then sold them after they watched them. There is a lot of 'Blah, blah, blah, in mint condition only watched once!!' being posted in the classifieds.

It made me wonder if there were any collectors out there!!. But like you say Ben, if your loaded then it has to be a more viable option than Blockbuster.

On the subject of higher defintion DVDs i agree that the market will change eventually but only if the leap in technology is significant. If we all had to upgrade our discs so they were questionably more superior than our previous offerings, then i don't think people will be convinced and the format won't progress.

I'm happy with my DVD collection and the format itself, however if there is one thing that bugs me it is that i'm always judging and questioning if the picture is flawless or was there enough bass in that explosion!!.

If i'm watching a movie for the first time i can't help but to pick at the quality of the disc, BECAUSE i know it should be the best. With VHS you would just put the film in and ENJOY the movie. There were no expectations regarding picture quality, at least not on the level of DVD.
Now i find myself questioning the picture and sound quality all the time, i can't help it. And if HD-DVD were to become more mainstream then, for me, it is going to take a lot out of the experience of WATCHING the movie. I hope it'll be a while before we see the next leap in technology and one that will immerse the viewer in a different way, like Lenny said, if we can experience in 3d that would truley be a step in the right direction. However, how that would affect story and character interaction is probably worth another thread in itself.

[Ringo]

When I first got my DVD player I bought several discs, that on reflection I was very unlikely to re-watch. I was drawn in by the Special Edition status etc; I think we all have!

I learnt after the first few discs that some of the extras are not a great as I though they would be and can leave a lot to be desired. I have therefore now whittled don my small collection via this forum to those "Classic" or well-loved movies. I also have the advantage of having an independent video hire shop in my town, that now has in excess of 1000 titles that operate I hire before I buy scheme.

Personally, I'm just a little concerned now about how may discs are being reissued already; does anyone remember the early days of CD and all those rushed releases? It’s almost like the studios are taking advantage of us collectors!

[Ben Martin]

Originally posted by Lenny Nero
Well yes, the resolution might be a little higher, but if you get a projector like in a theater, that wouldn't bother you, even right now.

shouldn't it be the other way round? if i get a projector then the image is being spread over a larger area and thus the 'limitations' of the resolution will be clearer to see? that said, it depends on how close you are to the screen (same for tvs and monitors of course), further away = image looks sharper. plus, using a progressive scan player should more than compensate for the increase in screen area, and i imagine those people here with projector setups could tell us about many technologies to improve the picture.

anyway, i think i understand more clearly now what you mean when you say "perceive". despite what i said above about 1500 lines of resolution on my monitor, when i watch the 525 lines of NTSC image on it from a distance of 8 feet it looks absolutely immaculate, pin-sharp, almost fluid and better than any tv set or cinema screen i have ever watched, and i agree that if the image was upped to over 1000 lines i couldn't tell the difference. i could if i sat close, but not from 8 feet on a 19" monitor!

that's the problem here - the idea of 'perception' is inherently relative. if i watch the same NTSC disc on a 32" sony wega tv set from 8 feet it still looks great but i can see the lines of resolution, and edge-enhancements and digital artifacts are much more noticeable. if i sat 20 feet away it might look as good as my monitor. but at 8 feet a display of that size would benefit greatly from increased resolution and it would be very noticeable.

More disc space of course will mean lower compression of audio and video, but again, the differences are only going to be major on paper and technically, not in our perception or experience of them.

but combined with more than twice the resolution that lower compression will make a huge, noticeable difference if your setup will benefit from it, i.e. the tv example above but not the monitor (unless you sit closer).

Audio isn't going to go much further either, unless you hang yourself in the air and place a speaker above and below yourself for 8.1EX*

better hope no-one from skywalker sound is reading this thread ... you'll be giving them ideas!! :D

human ears can't even identify the difference between 192kbps and 320kbps

true, but this is very much dependent on circumstances (and also on the state of an individual's ears!). i rip mp3s at 192kbps because i can't tell the difference between that and higher levels on the equipment i play them back on. however, hi-fi buffs who are far more knowledgeable than myself assure me that if you were to play a 192kbps file through hi-end equipment then it would noticeably perform less well. plus, the higher the bitrate the more 'natural' the track will sound and i would argue that the average ear can perceive that difference, even if it is not always aware of it. for example, listen to a pristine vinyl LP on a top-notch record deck and it will sound far better than the same album on CD.

[Lenny Nero]

With a projector the image is much better as it's not being restricted by a given TV's limitations. It's not a particular DVDs fault but the TV/Monitors we view them on, they limit the resolution. On projectors the image is like in a theater, no lines at all, its a big whole.

And vinyl will never sound better than a CD.

Also, you're talking about ripped MP3s, those are just basic stereo. I'm not talking about what kind of sound is encoded at a given bitrate, not differentiating between stereo or 2.0 surround or DTS, but take the same audio track and encode it at two different bitrates, 384 DTS sometimes even sounds better than 740+ kbps DTS tracks, it's about the content and quality of encoding the sound and no longer about the bitrate, as we've reached the highest needed for perfect listening. Any higher and its just a technical achievement and doesnt add to the experience.
But of course, there might be some things my stupid ancient 2001 brain cannot even think of yet. People were sure the earth was flat one day. But either way, it's all a matter of what one wants and for me, what I got right now, is enough and I'm pretty sure nothing major will come up in my lifetime. Sad about all the collection going to waste after I die though.

Oh forgot to add, think as a "serious" collector, what a collector and fan really wants is to own, to have their favourite movies available on some decent format to be able to watch whenever s/he wants. VHS's been around for two decades if not more, everything is out on VHS, LDs been around for 12 or so years, and any kind of TV movie or indie or anything is/was also released on LD. But DVD is fairly new with a huge history/library of films at each studio that isn't released yet, and some, MANY will probably never be released and will be lost forever. Not the high profile certain trilogies, but little gems, not financially successful enough to guarantee a big fan base and a DVD release. Those I keep on LD, and about 5 or 6 even on VHS, have to as I didn't find LDs yet and there might not be any even. So, let's say another new kind of home video format is presented in 10 or so years, you can't possibly re-buy again the whole library of movies you got on that new format, and then you would have to wait for things to get released again, and some won't. Take for example all the new releases/newly made films, even the baddest straight to video and box office dissapointments get released on DVD while classic gems are left on VHS or LD only. Well with that new format after DVD, same thing will be happening, but many of those on DVD now will not be re-released in that new format, just like some of those on VHS/LD are not going to be ever released on DVD. Uhh.. im losing my own point here but I'm sure you get what I'm saying. You cant just continue on rebuying your hundreds of movies every 10-20 years on a new format, plus you wont even be able to get them all.

[Ben Martin]

Originally posted by Lenny Nero
On projectors the image is like in a theater, no lines at all, its a big whole.

well, that's kind of what i always had hoped/expected but the only projector i have ever watched dvds on was anything but. watching the non-anamorphic JFK on a 7/8 foot screen with a high-spec projector with separate red, green and blue lamps displayed the most noticeable lines i've ever seen with very clear gaps in between.

the whole bitrate thing i agree with. it depends exactly what you're talking about and as we're both ably displaying here you could go on for days. i think we're fundamentally in agreement. likewise, i appreciate what you're saying about collections having to 're-start' every time a new format comes out, and that's not a point i'd argue with either.

i would argue, however, with this statement .... :)
And vinyl will never sound better than a CD.

... because is it quite simply incorrect. in reality, CD will never sound better than pristine vinyl because it is prevented from faithfully reproducing the depth and quality of the original recording by its 16bit depth and 44KHz sampling. before you start to get back to the quality of the mastertape you need at least 24bit/96KHz - and yes, the improvement is very noticeable. just ask anyone who has listened to DVD-A or SACD. vinyl is not limited in this way because it is an analogue format. however, i was only trying to illustrate a point and was not advocating us all returning to vinyl. i don't buy vinyl, i buy CD - and have been doing so for 10 years now. why? obviously because once you start using that vinyl is gets worn out and scratched and then despite its greater depth and more natural sound, you'd always go for CD. but the sound isn't "better".

i just thought this was relevant to the talk of what our ears can perceive. another example would be playing a song that appears uninterrupted in a dvd's credits and then listen to exactly the same track through the same sound system on CD - it won't sound anywhere near as good.

[Lenny Nero]

Well then I only had crappy vinyls and cheap speakers when I was little during the end of '80s, thats till one of our moves cause of my father being in the army our whole metal container with all posessions have been "misplaced" and stolen, somewhere in godforsaken Russia, including all the records, and that's the last I've seen/heard of them. So I got this biased non-fundamental opinion about CDs.

Oh yeah, end credits songs/music on DVD sounds way better of course, but it's in surround sound. Especially notable is the White Zombie song I am the One from Escape from LA, on CD "Run baby run baby runnin' away, run baby run escapin' LA" line is almost obscured by all the guitars and other instruments while on DVD its clear as day as you basically get a whole separate track for the voice.

Yes this could go on for days, all the possibilites and quality of this and that. Maybe we should start a thread discussing what the future may hold for DVD and home video in general.

[charlie angel]

Serious collector? Yes - anything I buy & don't think I'll watch twice gets sold - everything else is kept :)

[Ben Martin]

lenny, this could indeed go on and on and if so requires its own thread, so i'm stopping here too. just wanted to pick up on this one last thing though as i obviously didn't make my point clear above:

Originally posted by Lenny Nero
Oh yeah, end credits songs/music on DVD sounds way better of course, but it's in surround sound.

but it's not the surround that is making it better. i don't have a surround setup so it all plays through two stereo speakers. yeah, the surrounds may make it more interesting and enveloping if it's a good mix but i was specifically referring to the actual sound quality of the music. furthermore, whether you listen to the DD5.1 track or the dolby stereo 2.0 track the sound quality is still far better than CD. you're hearing a recording that is closer to the master tape - bettered only by DVD-A and SACD - that a CD of the same track through the same stereo (or surround) system simply couldn't touch. you're getting more sound information on the DVD, way beyond the 16bit/44KHz of CD (whether it's anywhere as high as DVD-A or SACD i don't know).

[KiLeAk]

A Collector - A person who makes a collection, as of stamps.

When you used to collect Panini Stickers, you didn't get rid of all your QPR players (including the legendary, Gary Mickelwhite, if you saw the photo you`ll remember !!!)

So if you collect, you buy as many DVD's as you can.

Well that`s my philosphy, hence why my collection is getting dangerously close to 500..... :rolleyes:

[JamesK]

I'd consider myself a collector. I've got around 220 DVDs. Never got rid of ANY aprt from Goldeneye - the original when I upgraded and Die Hard trilogy (same as Goldeneye). I don't even get rid of the REALLY shocking ones ie Farscape season 1 part 1. (I'd never sen it before - I thought it might be good...)

[Robby]

You guys are all putting me to shame, i have a measly 80 movies(about that) and i'm starting to think i have too many. Judging by how many everyone else is posting i don't think i have anything to worry about.:D

[grant]

I agree with some of the past posts,,
Ive been collecting movies since the early 80's, and had nearly 4000 VHS at one stage.
When I bought a laserdisc player, I started car-booting my VHS & made a load of cash, which I'm glad, as not many people want them now.
I'm a sucker for trading up my DVD's when a better version comes out, hell, I've just sold my R2 Terminator for the R1, as it has the original mono soundtrack & a better cover.
How many of you have all the John Waters DVD's ?
My wife thinks I'm barmey, cause ive got the Criterion laserdiscs of Pink Flamingoes & Polyester, purely cause they have different audio commentaries & extras.
:nuts: