PDA

View Full Version : Little Otik - EASILY the weirdest mutant baby film since 'Eraserhead'


Michael Brooke
19-10-2001, 13:45
I'm still trying to gather all the thoughts whirling around my head into a coherent review, which I hope will be up today, but Jan Svankmajer's fourth feature is just <U>stunning</U>.

Not only is it unquestionably the most disturbing and unsettling mutant baby film since <I>Eraserhead</I>, it's also a ruthlessly clear-eyed dissection of everything surrounding the whole issue of family life, from the creation of babies in the first place through their care and nurture during infancy and childhood, and the need to protect them both from unwanted outside attentions (the paedophile subplot is as unnerving as anything in <I>Happiness</I> or <I>Lolita</I>, especially when the man's flies appear to unbutton themselves) and indeed from themselves.

The story revolves around two families, the Horáks, who desperately want a baby, and the Stadlers, who have a little girl of their own but who don't really know what to do with her. And when the Horáks solve their problem by literally making a baby of their own out of a tree stump, young Alzbetka finds that she has a friend for the first time, even if he is a cannibalistic mutant tree-baby creature (although <I>Little Otik</I> is a vastly more sophisticated and intellectually coherent piece of work, fans of Frank Henenlotter's <I>Basket Case</I> films will feel right at home here) whose life seems to parallel that of the traditional Czech fairytale of Otesánek (the film's Czech title), about a child who can't stop eating.

The practically non-stop grotesquerie of the images and ideas will come as no surprise to anyone who's seen even one of Svankmajer's earlier films, but what's genuinely new here is a powerful emotional undercurrent. The tragedy of <I>Little Otik</I> is that everyone has a perfectly sound reason for their actions that comes from the most primitive and fundamental desires - the Horáks need a baby, Alzbetka needs a friend, Otik needs food.

Like his great Surrealist predecessor Luis Bunuel, Svankmajer is an absolute master of dream-logic - everything that happens in the film, no matter how weird, is absolutely logical and consistent. Indeed, one of the things that makes this by far his most involving film to date is that all his characters have their own motives and justifications for their actions, and even the most outrageous acts of violence (and there's at least one truly spectacular gross-out moment that will have fans of <I>Braindead</I> cheering) can be traced back to basically good intentions.

And Svankmajer is as prodigiously inventive as ever, not just in the individual animated set-pieces but also the more basic film arts - his jarring, aggressive editing style remains amongst the most distinctive of any film-maker currently working. Even though it's outwardly a lot more conventional than his wilder efforts - it has a totally linear narrative, recognisable human characters with names, personalities and even dialogue (in Svankmajer's native Czech) - you could guess the director from just five seconds' exposure to almost any scene.

More later, though I'll try to avoid spoilers - the less you know about this film in advance, the better! (That said, even though I'd read a fair chunk of the script, <U>nothing</U> can prepare you for a Svankmajer film - I could describe the whole thing in graphic detail and it would still take you by surprise)

Boink!
20-10-2001, 17:39
Well, I'm intrigued.
When's it out over here?

Boink! :cool:

adamvbarker
21-10-2001, 01:26
We just don't see enough mutant baby films. There should be more of them.

Sounds very interesting. Is it playing anywhere other than the NFT? The Evening Standard website only lists one showing, at the NFT on Monday 22nd at 8.10pm

Michael Brooke
21-10-2001, 10:54
It's opening officially on Friday at the ICA and Clapham Picturehouse in London, followed by a short regional tour. I know the Duke of York's in Brighton is showing it, and I suspect other regional cinemas of similar stature will be doing the same.

This is actually a wide release by Svankmajer standards - I worked on <I>Faust</I> and <I>Conspirators of Pleasure</I>, both of which saw just <U>two</U> prints going into circulation! The fact that it's distributed by Film Four probably helps - they're the biggest distributor yet associated with Svankmajer's work.

adamvbarker
21-10-2001, 13:48
Thanks, Michael. I'll probably try and catch it at the ICA.

the thing with no name
23-10-2001, 10:41
Originally posted by Michael Brooke
It's opening officially on Friday at the ICA and Clapham Picturehouse in London, followed by a short regional tour. I know the Duke of York's in Brighton is showing it, and I suspect other regional cinemas of similar stature will be doing the same.



Damn! :(

I tried to get tickets for the 18th at the ICA with his introduction, but it was sold out! Was his intro good Michael?
I'll have to catch it at Clapham or at Brighton when it arrives!

By the way Michael, do you know if you can get Alice on DVD? :confused:
I know Kino do a DVD of Faust (got cheaper from DV-Depot) and I would love Alice too. :)

adamvbarker
23-10-2001, 11:32
To answer your question to Michael, it certainly exists, Amazon.com list it here (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/6305779635/ref=pd_sim_dv/002-2193667-7292863)

I don't know anything about the disk though.

Michael Brooke
23-10-2001, 12:45
<B>I tried to get tickets for the 18th at the ICA with his introduction, but it was sold out! Was his intro good Michael? </B>

Fairly typical for Svankmajer - the intro was about ten seconds long and was essentially "this is a long film, so I won't waste your time before it starts", followed by a brief Q&A, where my favourite response was to an arse-achingly pretentious question about the film's philosophical influences - "If you say so".

The final question concerned where he found the actors, and the intriguing response was: "they're all professionals, except the little girl and the paedophile".

<B>By the way Michael, do you know if you can get Alice on DVD?
I know Kino do a DVD of Faust (got cheaper from DV-Depot) and I would love Alice too. </B>

All three of Svankmajer's previous features (<A HREF="http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/reviews/other/alice.html">Alice</A>, <A HREF="http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/reviews/other/faust.html">Faust</A> and <A HREF="http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/reviews/other/conspiratorsofpleasure.html">Conspirators of Pleasure</A>) are out on DVD, together with two of the shorts - click the titles to read my reviews. Given FilmFour's involvement - they put £200,000 into the film - it's an absolute certainty that <I>Little Otik</I> will get a DVD release some time next year.

Budge
31-05-2003, 09:33
Brought this one up from the dead, as it's now on FilmFour's listigs for next week...

anield
31-05-2003, 10:50
...and it's due for a DVD release in June. Details here (http://www.playserver2.com/play247.asp?page=search&adudisc=y).

cat
31-05-2003, 14:15
blimey that's cheap - paid quite a bit more for my copy!!! any info on extras anywhere? would be interesting to compare..

Joober
31-05-2003, 19:37
I saw this last year, I thought it was pretty good :)

James45
14-06-2003, 12:56
Just finished watching this and thought it was excellent, I'd seen Svankmajer's Faust years ago and by comparison Little Otik was relatively normal. Performances were excellent and the fairy tale story was superb.
Only criticism i could make is that it could be a touch long at 2hrs+

Bought the r2 dvd on a gamble not expecting it to be a title I'd want to hang on to, but i will be.

Michael Brooke
14-06-2003, 17:37
Originally posted by James45
I'd seen Svankmajer's Faust years ago and by comparison Little Otik was relatively normal.

I'm so glad you used the word "relatively"... :D

Noel M
15-06-2003, 15:54
Originally posted by cat
blimey that's cheap - paid quite a bit more for my copy!!! any info on extras anywhere? would be interesting to compare..

Cheap, but it is in 4:3 ratio and no extras. Anyone any information on what the aspect ratio should be and whether this is pan and scanned or full-frame?

Michael Brooke
15-06-2003, 16:58
It's 100% definitely 4:3 - I watched it in that ratio at the ICA with Svankmajer in attendance, and you can't get much more authoritative than that!

It's obviously Svankmajer's preferred aspect ratio - 29 out of 30 of his films are in 4:3, the one exception being his second film, <I>J.S.Bach Fantasia in G minor</I> way back in 1965, which was a one-off flirtation with 2.35:1.

My own copy of <I>Little Otík</I> is the Czech edition, which has comprehensive text-based extras in English, but not much more. To be honest, there's nothing on the disc that you can't find elsewhere, so I wouldn't worry too much.

Michael Brooke
16-06-2003, 09:35
Incidentally, for those who haven't yet seen it, it's on FilmFour tonight.

cat
10-09-2003, 08:22
£7.99 at play - which has to be a bargain! Anyone got this version? still wondering how it compares - does it have the little girls audition/rehearsal on it?

James45
10-09-2003, 10:25
That's the version I have and from what I can remember its a barebones release, although the film is well worth £7.99 of your money.

shlunk
20-10-2003, 16:11
Does the £7.99 version at Play have burnt-in subtitles? What's the picture quality like? Tempted to get this, but if it's worth spending a little extra, I'd probably do so...

Andy

kaine106
20-10-2003, 18:54
Sounds weird, a tree trunk baby? Is it alive or do they imagine it to be?

James45
20-10-2003, 18:56
oh no it's alive just ask the postman!:gag:

Paul Lynock
22-10-2003, 17:01
It's only £5.99 at dvd.co.uk I believe

jdanielp
24-11-2003, 11:52
on C4 tonight :thumbs:

Richie
24-11-2003, 16:04
Tuesday 25th 12:40 am - 3:00am to be precise!

kaine106
24-11-2003, 20:45
Is it scary? Or just surreal?

ralph wiggum
24-11-2003, 22:06
Blimey, seeing this thread back at the top, i thought that one of the forums major celebreties had returned.:D

Barney_Tabasco
24-11-2003, 23:05
Afraid not ralph, but he can currently be seen in panto as Wishy Washy in Aladdin at the Alhambra in Bradford.



:p

Just Call Me Wanda
25-11-2003, 09:56
I'll give Little Otik one thing: it kept me up until 3am.

It's an enjoyable film, no doubt, but I constantly tried to categorise the film and ended up coming to the conclusion, as the film neared its end, that it was a very surreal, offbeat horror-drama.

I have to say, with regret, I really didn't understand what the film was trying to say past it had something to do with the family aesthetic - at one point I thought the director was trying to make a case for dealing with over-population: 'all these kids, let's make one out of a tree stump that comes alive and eats everybody!'

Perhaps you aren't supposed to connect to any of the characters, but I found none of them engaging - they're all 'looney', with the little girl coming across as the most intelligent person in the film. It's a little long, and it has some quite dull sections.

That said, the social worker scene is great - it had me laughing and, sadistically, almost cheering! :)

James45
25-11-2003, 11:39
i certainly read it as a comment on the family aesthetic as you say.

DM
28-11-2003, 02:59
It freaked me out a little. My nipper says 'dada' in exactly the same way that Otik does. :eek: I'm now feeding him more. :D

Bish Bash Bosh
29-11-2003, 22:01
Theres not much I can say that hasnt already been said. I found it interesting and disturbing but also a little too long. IIRC it was around 2hr 20 min and it could have done with being cut down by at least 30 minutes in my opinion. Whilst watching it I was often reminded of Eraserhead, not just the fact that both have odd 'children' in them but also the way food is manipulated in both.

Surprisingly I found the opening hour much more interesting than the latter half of the film. The way in which the mother desperately needs to hang on to the idea that Otik will end up being real is really quite moving.

KeyserSoze
29-11-2003, 23:51
what happened to Michael Brooke ?

damn missed this when it was TV, really wanted to to watch it as well.